tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12564440.post7959245511086894681..comments2023-06-24T16:17:33.189-05:00Comments on Studeo: My Thinking Spot: Open to Correctionlove2learnmomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10548471887979257624noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12564440.post-17909611694381275562008-02-23T10:36:00.000-06:002008-02-23T10:36:00.000-06:00Alicia,I couldn't agree more!Alicia,<BR/><BR/>I couldn't agree more!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12564440.post-58781578634737888562008-02-23T10:08:00.000-06:002008-02-23T10:08:00.000-06:00Thanks for your very thoughtful commentary, Dr. Th...Thanks for your very thoughtful commentary, Dr. Thursday! Lots to think about and I'll have to try to absorb the ideas over multiple readings - good stuff!<BR/><BR/>Yes, the typos are almost their own special case and that can be really tough. I tend to give books a bit of a "grace period" (if you will) since everyone has typos to a certain extent, but there are some that are much more serious - such as typos in a crossword puzzle or in a child's spelling book - whereas a handful of typos in a novel or a non-fiction work for adults tends to be much less serious.love2learnmomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10548471887979257624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12564440.post-8466074770935570712008-02-23T09:13:00.000-06:002008-02-23T09:13:00.000-06:00You are right that it has to do with the INTERNET ...You are right that it has to do with the INTERNET in general and blogging in particular. But even more relevant is the fact that for some time "we" have fallen out of the habit of WRITING about what we think - we sure enough TALK about it, but are not used to writing it. So often we write reactively... We are replying, we do not by any means express OUR thought but only react to what we THINK is the thought of another. And we may not have read correctly in the first place.<BR/><BR/>It may be silly to remind ourselves of such basic matters, but any kind of writing - if it is to be GOOD writing - requires (1) really knowing what it is we are thinking and (2) the ability to use words to get some semblance of that thought across to ANOTHER mind. Maybe we ought to READ more, and perhaps flip through a dictionary occasionally. Or even a Latin grammar.<BR/><BR/>When we get a blogg, we are in a sense ordained as newspaper EDITORS - not simply columnists. We have to decide our editorial policy, our editorial style and frequency of editorial leaders (the main column we write) and our handling of letters to the editor (the comment box). If we write "enough", people can get used to our style, even if they do not know us by non-electronic means... they will understand if we wrote in mere emotion, or in haste, or perhaps, like GKC, skip some steps in an otherwise well-considered argument.<BR/><BR/>Criticism is by no means the only form of writing to suffer - all others, from leading columns (blogg-postings) to letters-to-the-editor (comment boxes) - have the same problem. Managing this, and bringing it to a better overall state, will require patience, a good bit more attention to preliminary thought, and to our choice of expression.<BR/><BR/>Finally we really need to take a very forgiving - an open, tolerant, but honest view, especially when it comes to typos and mis-spellings. As I have cause to know in horrid detail, having handled most of GKC's books byte-by-byte, just about every one, whether printed in the early 1900s or the early 2000s, contains typos. Such things, unless truly egregious, ought to be handled by another means. It reminds me of the famous slip in Lewis's <I>That Hideous Strength</I> about trusting to CALVARY (not cavalry) in today's modern military conflicts. <BR/><BR/>Finally, let us try to be Scholastics - who always argued FOR their opponent's own case first before replying. But if that is too mysterious a reference, take GKC's famous words about his good friend <I>and enemy</I>, George Bernard Shaw:<BR/><BR/>"I am not concerned with Mr. Bernard Shaw as one of the most brilliant and one of the most <BR/>honest men alive; I am concerned with him as a Heretic - that is to say, a man whose philosophy is quite solid, quite coherent, and quite wrong." [GKC, <I>Heretics</I> CW1:46]<BR/><BR/>It is indeed possible to deal with a man's thought in bitter warfare - and yet respect him, praise him, even be friends with him. "Go therefore and do likewise."<BR/><BR/>--Dr. ThursdayAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com